The growing use of experimental methods — Heather Smith, president of Rock the Vote, calls them “prescription drug trials for democracy” — is convulsing a profession where hunches and instinct have long ruled. Already, experimental findings have upended a lot of folk wisdom about how votes are won. The most effective direct mail might not be the most eye-catching in the mailbox but the least conspicuous. It is better to have an anonymous, chatty volunteer remind voters it’s Election Day than a recorded message from Bill Clinton or Jay-Z. The most winnable voters may be soft supporters of the opposition, not the voters who polls say are undecided. (“Undecided” may just be another word for “unlikely to vote.”)Check out the full article at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/magazine/31politics-t.html. Happy Thanksgiving!
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Article in NY Times
Short post today for the holidays. There was a great article in the NY Times a few weeks ago about the use of testing in political campaigns. Here's a nice excerpt:
Posted by Michael Kaiser-Nyman at 8:40 AM